≪ View Page

Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

Link to this comparison view

Both sides previous revisionPrevious revision
Next revision		Previous revision
2024_revamp_logs [2024/11/23 20:43] – jkohts2024_revamp_logs [2025/01/08 04:40] (current) – jkohts
Line 16: Line 16:
       * Include plugin by Michael Hamann **[2024-11-07]**  - to allow referencing between pages without retyping. Has to be in the same namespace.       * Include plugin by Michael Hamann **[2024-11-07]**  - to allow referencing between pages without retyping. Has to be in the same namespace.
       * RefNotes Plugin by Mykola Ostrovskyy **[2024-11-07]**  - for references.       * RefNotes Plugin by Mykola Ostrovskyy **[2024-11-07]**  - for references.
-      * EditTable plugin by Andreas Gohr **[2024-11-24]** - editable GUI for table editing, compatible with base syntax. Doesn't mess up table formatting when using CKGedit.+      * EditTable plugin by Andreas Gohr **[2024-11-24]**  - editable GUI for table editing, compatible with base syntax. Doesn't mess up table formatting when using CKGedit. 
 +      * Mermaid Plugin by Robert Weinmeister **[2025-01-08]** - mindmap editor just for sitemap structure.
   * Hierarchical breadcrumbs turned on **[2024-09-07]**  - to allow for hierarchical navigating; might need to revisit this because of the flat file structure and many-to-many relationships.   * Hierarchical breadcrumbs turned on **[2024-09-07]**  - to allow for hierarchical navigating; might need to revisit this because of the flat file structure and many-to-many relationships.
  
Line 28: Line 29:
   * References probably should not be all-encompassing. I feel that useful review papers, or studies, or case reports should deserve the mention in the footer. If we want to reference small claims, either linking or including the PMID would probably suffice. However, Farkas seems to link and reference all the PMIDs…   * References probably should not be all-encompassing. I feel that useful review papers, or studies, or case reports should deserve the mention in the footer. If we want to reference small claims, either linking or including the PMID would probably suffice. However, Farkas seems to link and reference all the PMIDs…
   * On phone with this template, two-level bullets probably should be the maximum. And if so, second bullet should contain minimal words.   * On phone with this template, two-level bullets probably should be the maximum. And if so, second bullet should contain minimal words.
 +  * Need to create [[https://www.dokuwiki.org/faq:sidebar|sidebar]] - done.
 +  * Templates
 +      * Mikio theme by James Collins **[2024-11-25]**  and associated mikioplugin - userall.css for horizontal lines.
  
 ===== 3. Dokuwiki database structure ===== ===== 3. Dokuwiki database structure =====
Line 38: Line 42:
       * Maybe vit D - endocrine and renal       * Maybe vit D - endocrine and renal
   * Naming should be "X_toxicity" or "X_antidote" because some drugs are used as antidotes/treatments for other toxins.   * Naming should be "X_toxicity" or "X_antidote" because some drugs are used as antidotes/treatments for other toxins.
-      * Might need to change 'antidote' to something else. Not all treatments are antidotes. +      * Might need to change 'antidote' to something else. Not all treatments are antidotes.
   * Probably two ways to identify drug class - by systems and also by alphabetical or class.   * Probably two ways to identify drug class - by systems and also by alphabetical or class.
       * Because "beta blocker" under HF meds sounds like a treatment option, although this is a tox site.       * Because "beta blocker" under HF meds sounds like a treatment option, although this is a tox site.
Line 69: Line 73:
 ==== Page changelog ==== ==== Page changelog ====
  
-  * [[beta_blocker_toxicity|Beta blocker]] - copied from old ver. [2024-11-05]+  * [[:beta_blocker_toxicity|Beta blocker]] - copied from old ver. [2024-11-05]